eff6a51a70
Submitted a retry decorator and it was pointed out that the retrying library was already in global-requirements, it would probably be good to leverage this and use it rather than roll our own, so let's add it to our version of requirements and then we can look at whether using a decorator or just leveraging the lib is the right way to go. Change-Id: Ieea042e5cd65b7c7bfa803996f60856fcae054bf
48 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
48 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
# The order of packages is significant, because pip processes them in the order
|
|
# of appearance. Changing the order has an impact on the overall integration
|
|
# process, which may cause wedges in the gate later.
|
|
|
|
pbr>=0.6,!=0.7,<1.0
|
|
anyjson>=0.3.3
|
|
argparse
|
|
Babel>=1.3
|
|
eventlet>=0.15.2
|
|
greenlet>=0.3.2
|
|
iso8601>=0.1.9
|
|
keystonemiddleware>=1.0.0
|
|
kombu>=2.5.0
|
|
lxml>=2.3
|
|
netaddr>=0.7.12
|
|
oslo.config>=1.6.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
oslo.concurrency>=0.3.0,!=0.4.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
oslo.context>=0.1.0
|
|
oslo.db>=1.4.1 # Apache-2.0
|
|
oslo.messaging>=1.4.0,!=1.5.0
|
|
oslo.rootwrap>=1.3.0
|
|
oslo.serialization>=1.2.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
oslo.utils>=1.2.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
osprofiler>=0.3.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
paramiko>=1.13.0
|
|
Paste
|
|
PasteDeploy>=1.5.0
|
|
pycrypto>=2.6
|
|
pyparsing>=2.0.1
|
|
python-barbicanclient>=2.1.0,!=3.0.0
|
|
python-glanceclient>=0.15.0
|
|
python-novaclient>=2.18.0
|
|
python-swiftclient>=2.2.0
|
|
requests>=2.2.0,!=2.4.0
|
|
retrying>=1.2.3,!=1.3.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
Routes>=1.12.3,!=2.0
|
|
taskflow>=0.6
|
|
rtslib-fb>=2.1.39
|
|
six>=1.7.0
|
|
SQLAlchemy>=0.9.7,<=0.9.99
|
|
sqlalchemy-migrate>=0.9.1,!=0.9.2
|
|
stevedore>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
suds>=0.4
|
|
WebOb>=1.2.3
|
|
wsgiref>=0.1.2
|
|
oslo.i18n>=1.3.0 # Apache-2.0
|
|
xattr>=0.4
|